🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives laid to rest in resting places vulnerable to coastal erosion say that a lack of decision on how best to address the problem is creating unnecessary distress concerning the final resting places of their departed family.

A Looming Threat to Historic Graveyards

The council have identified three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being swallowed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A recent report on the situation details a series of possible actions, from taking no action to exhuming remains and reburying them in safer sites. Officials say it is for local people to determine how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It upsets me. They intended this to be their last home, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Estimates suggest at least part of one churchyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Past

A local business owner recalled a childhood visit to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the sea, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that the deceased will just get carried away to sea. They won’t. Individuals will take bones as mementos and go plundering graves looking for valuables. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the beach. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Along the shoreline lies the grave of a ex-soldier killed while serving overseas. His parent expressed she could not sleep after learning her child's grave might one day be moved.

“It truly disturb me to consider this won’t be his permanent home,” she said. “For us it’s an significant place to go.”

In her view, new burials should cease but says it is too soon to disturb existing graves. “My preference for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an early decision needs to be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Searching for Answers and Certainty

An absence of agreement over when and how to tackle the problem has left grieving relatives feeling exasperated and anxious.

Some want additional sea defences to delay the unavoidable loss and to permit funerals to proceed for now. Others argue the moment for moving graves is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotive,” said one relative. “The official study was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And everybody is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A local official said the graveyards were under the care of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is up to them to choose the direction to take. We are here to help support them through that journey with residents.”

It was also stated there was ample time to consider all the choices. “This concerns decades before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should happen yet. We need productive local conversations to discover the appropriate solutions for each community.”

The prospect of the loss of the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “immense sorrow for the local community,” but church representatives also spoke of a belief in resurrection, offering a theological perspective on the physical disappearance of sacred ground.